rabbit anti cd86 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
Structured Review

Rabbit Anti Cd86 Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti cd86 antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Circadian disruption exacerbates MASH by reducing Akkermansia muciniphila via the FXR-CYP7A1-bile acid axis"
Article Title: Circadian disruption exacerbates MASH by reducing Akkermansia muciniphila via the FXR-CYP7A1-bile acid axis
Journal: iScience
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115397
Figure Legend Snippet: Circadian disruption promotes inflammation, lipid accumulation, and fibrosis in MASH mice (A) The relative mRNA expression of lipid-metabolism-related genes ( Srebp , Fasn , and Acaca ), inflammation-related genes ( Cxcl2 , Ccl2 , and Nos2 ), and fibrosis-related genes ( Col3a1 , Col4a1 , and α-Sma ) in MASH with or without circadian disruption, n = 6. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of the abundance of macrophages (CD11b + F4/80 + ), M1 cells (CD86 + CD206 − ), and M2 cells (CD86 − CD206 + ) in the liver in each group, n = 6. (C) Comparison of M1/M2 polarization in the liver in each group by CD86/CD206 detected by immunohistochemistry. Scale bars: 100 μm (10×). (D) Serum IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α in each group, n = 6. (E) The relative expression level of the oxidative stress indicator ROS, the content of GSH, and the relative mRNA expression level of Hif-1α related to them in each group, n = 6. (F) The total number of genes detected by liver transcriptomics, as well as the number of genes that are relatively upregulated and downregulated in the two groups. (G) NMDS plot of the main components of liver transcriptomics in each group, n = 4. (H) Reactome analysis results (barplot) of liver transcriptomics in the two groups. (I) Reactome analysis results (dotplot) of liver transcriptomics in the two groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SD ( n = 4–6), ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001, compared with the MASH group. p values were calculated using unpaired t test. Srebp , sterol regulatory element-binding protein; Fasn , fatty acid synthase; Acaca , acetyl-CoA carboxylase; Cxcl2 , chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 2; Ccl2 , chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 2; Nos2 , nitric oxide synthase 2; Col3a1 , collagen alpha-1 (III) chain; Col4a1 , collagen alpha-1 (IV) chain; α-Sma , α-smooth muscle actin; M1, M1 polarization of macrophages; M2, M2 polarization of macrophages; CD11b, marker of mouse macrophages; F4/80, marker of mouse macrophages; CD86, marker of M1 polarization of mouse macrophages; CD206, marker of M2 polarization of mouse macrophages; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-1β, interleukin-1 beta; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; ROS, reactive oxygen species; GSH, glutathione; Hif-1α , hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha; NMDS, non-metric multidimensional scaling.
Techniques Used: Disruption, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Comparison, Immunohistochemistry, Transcriptomics, Binding Assay, Marker
